A side-by-side review for nonprofits choosing between two donor management platforms. Honest, sourced, and updated quarterly.
Free tier real enough to actually run a small org on.
Recurring giving with retry logic and donor self-managed cards.
Pledge tracking with bill-pay reminders and forgiveness rules.
Hebcal-aware (synagogues), tithe statements (churches), alumni cohorts (schools). Out of the box, not as add-ons.
Event seating with a real seating map and walk-up checkout.
Polished event, P2P, and ticketing experience that donors and fundraisers find pleasant.
Scale: built for the volume of a $5M plus organization, with reliability and infrastructure to match.
Integration with GoFundMe broadens reach for cause campaigns.
Strong reporting on the campaign side, with donation-form A/B testing as a first-class capability.
Symbols: ✓ included, ◐ partial or on a higher tier, — not available. Reviewed 2026-05-06; we re-verify quarterly. Classy pricing source.
Smaller orgs often outgrow Classy on cost before they outgrow it on capability. DonorForge replaces the donation forms and adds donor stewardship; teams typically run both during cutover for a fundraising cycle.
Classy is a real product, made by a real team, used by real organizations. Mid-to-large nonprofits running event-heavy and peer-to-peer programs at scale. If that profile fits, you should evaluate it on its own terms.
DonorForge exists for a different shape of org: smaller or mid-size, want a modern UI, value a free tier they can run on, and want recurring giving and pledge tracking that work on the entry plan, not as upgrades. We are newer than the legacy CRMs, which means faster iteration and a smaller integrations library; the trade is real and we name it.
The honest version: if you are deciding by spreadsheet, the answer is whichever of these matches more rows in your spreadsheet, not the marketing page's.